My sister and I took a very long walk the other day, and what came out of it was not just autumn leaves and crisp air. My sister is sometimes a little, wonderful sage with insights so true and profound she blows my mind away.
THE NASTY UGLINESS OF FAKE COMPLIMENTS
Where we grew up, we learned a system of complimenting other girls and women that in truth are not compliments at all. We define ourselves and others through an inverted movement of interaction where our compliments more often than not, are masked judgments - of ourselves and our own bodies. They are veils of uncertainty and hopelessness. They are poisonous critique rather than a genuine acknowledgment of the woman we are complimenting.
"Those pants look so good on you. I could never fit into that size!"
"Wow, I wish I had the discipline to be as good as you when it comes to workout/healty eating/whatever is actually beneficial to you and your body"
"I don't understand how you can eat that much chocolate and still be so skinny"
"I wish I was as lucky as you"
"You're so healthy, you've good nothing to complain about... Look at me!"
These are not compliments.
They are cleverly disguised admonissions, putting ourselves - and the recipient - down. They are disrespectful not just towards our own body, but towards the person we are talking to.
So what do we really say when we make statements lik "Wow, you're really good, I could never be like that" or "It's easy for you to say, you're just born slim/healthy/good looking"? We solidify our own patterns of self judment. We state our own defeat. We share our lack of self-care, self-respect, and ultimately - what we do when we see the greatness in someone else and try to express what we see - we do not acknowledge THEIR greatness, but we attach our own littleness to it, weigh it down, and make ourselves "not that".
What we present as praise is nothing other than insecurity and jealousy. It has nothing to do with compliments.
This is not OK.
It makes us liars.
We twist our words into becoming what they are not. We become glossy politicians speaking with forked tongues, playing games of untruth and deception. Receiving a "compliment" like this is equally as disheartening and negative. It is nearly impossible to receive praise gracefully when the words that are presented to us as "kindness" in actuality cover up its nasty opposite.
We learn from each other, and we pass it on to others. We become our own spiteful silver-tongued assassins.
Every day I wake up and silently commit to myself and the world to live and speak from what I know is the highest truth of myself. I vow to share who I am with as much love, kindness and respect as I can muster. Respect towards others and respect towards myself.
The first step in destroying the ugly, nasty dragon of fake compliments is recognizing its existence in ourselves and others. The second one is cutting its head off when it appears.
Happy hunting, ladies.
Love, M.
Restructuring the future. Passion, truth and honesty. We are all vintage in this world.
Monday, September 15, 2014
Fake compliments
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Friday, May 23, 2014
OPERATION BEAUTIFUL
So, the GOING GREEN challenge is coming along wonderfully! I'm feeling full of energy, even though I'm fighting a cold and "everyone" seems to be coming down with something. Also I actually feel pretty darn good knowing that I haven't eaten any minced up factory animals the last week either.
Anyhow, I came across this WONDERFUL amazing blog and I can't rave enough about it, so I'll just send you over there straight away: GO CHECK OUT ohsheglows.com.
So, the ACTUAL thing I was going to share with you today, is this amazing idea I found through ohsheglows.com's site: OPERATION BEAUTIFUL, and
I
LOVE
IT.
And I'm starting this operation right here right now. Join me :)
Anyhow, I came across this WONDERFUL amazing blog and I can't rave enough about it, so I'll just send you over there straight away: GO CHECK OUT ohsheglows.com.
Angela Liddon: Food genius
So, the ACTUAL thing I was going to share with you today, is this amazing idea I found through ohsheglows.com's site: OPERATION BEAUTIFUL, and
I
LOVE
IT.
And I'm starting this operation right here right now. Join me :)
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Monday, May 19, 2014
GOING GREEN - JOIN THE CHALLENGE
(Photo: Arne Iversen/NTB scanpix)
This morning I read an article in the Norwegian paper DN (Dagens Næringsliv).
It speaks of the current situation we are facing: The methods and ways we are currently feeding ourselves (mainly with INSANE AMOUNTS of meat) are quickly pushing us over the edge and into the abyss. Which abyss, you might ask?
Well, you know the cure-all-failsafe-device called Antibiotics that we all too often use as a quick band-aid to patch us up with? It's quickly turning into becoming absolutely non-efficient.
which means... You could die from a small scratch. Or any other mild bacterial infection.
Anyhow.
This is not the point. The point is:
Two thirds of the 300.000 - 500.000 tons of antibiotics (READ THAT AGAIN)
Two thirds of the 300.000 - 500.000 tons of antibiotics we use anually are being fed to animals and chickens to avoid that the way we breed them kills them. In other words: The way we treat and breed our food is totally inefficient. It leads to diseases and damages our food (i.e. animals) and because of this, we have to treat the symptoms by pouring TONS AND TONS of antibiotics into their food.
This has to stop.
And it stops with me.
I've got a new challenge going. I'd love for you to join me.
I'm done with this industry. I'm done eating meat stuffed full of antibiotics, bred in cages and stripped from animals grown unnaturally into a life of pain. I'm done eating chickens. Until I either a) breed and eat my own or b) eat someone else's sustainably "grown" meat, I'm done.
No more industrialized meat or poultry.
Join the challenge and drop me a comment below :)
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Thursday, March 13, 2014
Greenqueen and the elephant
Your very own Greenqueen got her first article published in the amazing Elephant Journal! Hoorraaaayyy!
Go check it out here:
From Weight Loss to Weightless
Go check it out here:
From Weight Loss to Weightless
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Sunday, September 01, 2013
Fiction and science; The hidden Truth of the fantastic - Part II - The Never Ending Story
I think that sometimes Truth is found in its purest form in the books that we call fiction. I think that somehow the deepest Knowings of the universe cannot be grasped in factual descriptions and school books, but by immersing ourselves in a story which in itself catches our attention with the ripples of action on the surface but contains within it the fullness of a Truth so profound we can only sense it by the way it makes our skin tingle. Even this immersion into parallel universes of fiction are touched upon in this book:
“If you have never wept bitter tears because a wonderful story has come to an end and you must take your leave of the characters with whom you have shared so many adventures, whom you have loved and admired, for whom you have hoped and feared, and without whose company life seems empty and meaningless.
If such things have not been part of your own experience, you probably won't understand what Bastian did next.”
When I first started writing this blog post, I thought it would be a short post about the beauty of this book, and how it slightly touches the recent findings of cognitive science and language.
I was wrong.
This book is in itself such a deep, clear portrayal of how our mind and inner world of concepts are constructed. And in this structuring, our whole experience, and ultimately our own world of being - both in the physical and mental - is created.
To explain this a bit further, I'll use a poignant quote from the book:
“If you stop to think about it, you’ll have to admit that all the stories in the world consist essentially of twenty-six letters. The letters are always the same, only the arrangement varies. From letters words are formed, from words sentences, from sentences chapters, and from chapters stories.”
Is it not fascinating that Noam Chomsky - one of the pioneers in cognitive science and revolutionaries of how we think about language - coined the same thought in 1991?:
— Noam Chomsky.
...which in turn can be traced back to the forefathers of the Universal Grammar theories — Antoine Arnauld and Claude Lancelot (in the 1660's!!!):
‘It remains for us to examine the spiritual element of speech ... this marvelous invention of composing from twenty-five or thirty sounds an infinite variety of words, which, although not having any resemblance in themselves to that which passes through our minds, nevertheless do not fail to reveal to others all of the secrets of the mind, and to make intelligible to others who cannot penetrate into the mind all that we conceive and all of the diverse movements of our souls.’
In the world of linguistic theory, this is called Digital infinity; or more accurately the infinite use of finite means.
Is it any wonder I love literature?
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Fiction and science; The hidden Truth of the fantastic - Part I - The Never Ending Story
"Are you and I and all Fantastica," she asked, "are we all recorded in this book?"
He wrote, and at the same time she heard his answer: "No, you've got it wrong. This book is all Fantastica - and you and I."
"But where is this book?"
And he wrote the answer: "In the book."
In the movie "The Neverending Story" from 1984 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088323/) - based on the magnificent book by Michael Ende (http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27712.The_Neverending_Story) (READ IT!) - one of the most intriguing aspects of words are introduced.
A thing does not exist until it is given a name.
I remember being mesmerized by this from the first time I heard it as a child. All of Fantasia is being swallowed up by the Nothing - not darkness, not anything at all - just pure nothingness. There's nothing there. At all.
As the Nothingness silently engulfs each piece of grass, wood, rock and living being, the world is quietly slipping away - becoming no thing at all. Shapeless, a void. '
"The Nothing is spreading," groaned the first. "It's growing and growing, there's more of it every day, if it's possible to speak of more nothing. All the others fled from Howling Forest in time, but we didn't want to leave our home. The Nothing caught us in our sleep and this is what it did to us."
"Is it very painful?" Atreyu asked.
"No," said the second bark troll, the one with the hole in his chest. "You don't feel a thing. There's just something missing. And once it gets hold of you, something more is missing every day. Soon there won't be anything left of us.”
The book differs slightly (or should I say extremely) from the movie. They are both good, in my opinion, the book because it is one deep profound piece of exquisite writing; The movie because I deeply, deeply loved it as a child.
What is common ground in both books is that Bastian is the unknowing savior of the world. By giving the childlike princess a name, he literally "calls her into existence" and by doing so saves the world. In the field of biocognitivism "we", as observers, are defined and recognized by one thing only: We are able to distinguish 'something' from 'something else', and by doing so; We become separate from our surroundings and thus become a "Self".
The implications of this are puzzling.
Since the universe consists of waves and particles vibrating at different frequencies, clustering together forming differently shaped objects, there is actually no set limit to where "I" begin and where "everything else" starts. Sure, I've got skin, but what keeps my skin in place, what constitutes this recurring reproduction of physical human form? These questions are the most important ones that the biocognitivists try to answer, and I can by no means say that the answers exist. What DOES exist, is the explanations of what defines human consciousness; In other words: What "I" am.
"I" am the consciousness identified with a human form, limited by the outlines of your skin and your physical appearance. The physicality of you changes throughout your life, but somehow there seems to be a consistent "I" that follow and inhabit this human form and is deeply engrained in it. This reflects in our language. We say "this is my hand" or this is my new hairdo". Newsflash; You're not your hair. Not your hand either.
I remember I used to drive myself crazy as a kid, trying to define how much of my human body I could peel away before "I" disappeared. Would I still be me if my brain were the only thing kept alive? Or what about heart? I never found the answer.
What I did find, was a definition of what "I" am, and I found it in the most unlikely place: In language theory. (Following excerpts from the book Autopoesis and Cognition by Francisco J. Varela & Humberto R. Maturana)
"The actual component (all their properties included) and the actual relations holding between them that concretely realize a system as a particular member of the class (kind) of composite unities to which it belongs by its organization, constitute its structure."
Furthermore: "The fundamental cognitive operation that an observer performs is the operation of distinction. By means of this operation the observer specifies a unity as an entity distinct from a background and a background as the domain in which an entity is distinguished."
This last part is the important one.
What makes us human and what creates an "I" separate from "Everything" is, in other words, the ability to distinguish one thing from another. Seems trivial, doesn't it?
OUR WHOLE WORLD IS MADE UP OF THE WORDS WE USE TO DEFINE EVERYTHING IN IT.
If this doesn't rock your world, you need another drink.
We're all freakin' Adam in the garden of Eden.
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
What is happiness?
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Monday, August 26, 2013
What happened to women?
What happened to women?
A very good
friend of mine, and also the author of my all-time favorite blog (http://kraakereiret.blogg.no/), asked me a
question about women and movies the other day.
"What do I think about
female movie directors?"
It seemed quite simple at first, but then I
started thinking.
And yes, I
do that a lot.
You see, he
had been in an argument with a feminist about this topic - and her take on it
was that there should be a certain quota for female directors and actresses –
much like the female quota system in politics and public boards. I shook my
head at first. How stupid. That's like forcing people to watch bad movies just
because some politically correct feminist activist thinks it's unfair that
there are no good female directors.
And then I
stopped dead in my own tracks. Wait a minute… Did I just say that? Do I
honestly think that all female directors are bad? What about female script
writers? Actresses? Female leads in movies? Do I deep down equate "female
in movies" with Chick Flicks?
Sadly…
Yes. I do.
And now I'm
determined to get to the bottom of this. I – female extravaganza – have somewhere
along the line adopted this view that women in movies are somehow less than men
– that all female directors are touchy feely sensitive things whom only know
how to make stories about girly stuff and pink fluffy sob stories, relationship
drama and/or both.
Alright, so this movie "Dis" is by Aune Sand. Not a very good example. How about this:
Margareth Olin: Kroppen Min
This
shocked me. I didn't know I had this judgmental attitude. I love it and I hate
it when I discover these things about myself. I hate it because I am faced with
my own narrow-minded belief systems. I love it because it gives me the freedom
to unravel the system that creates it.
I asked
Lugburz to tell me more about it. He sent me a link to a blog (here: http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2013/06/14/191568762/at-the-movies-the-women-are-gone) which made me think even more. Not
just about movies, but about books to. TV shows. Computer games. Anything with
a story in it. As a linguist and literary critic (and sometimes even a writer)
I believe that by studying the stories that make up our society, we can study
society in itself. And boy… What a gloomy read it is at times.
First off.
Talking about women in any context, is, in our society, a topic that is riddled
with emotional anger, tainted by an aggressive feminist movement (although
necessary at the time), colored by streaks of self-righteousness, struggle,
entitlement and a dualistic dichotomy of male/female and the battle of the
sexes.
I should know a bit about both. Not because I'm a feminist in the
traditional sense (I'm not), but because I'm a femininist (if that's even a
word) I am also a masculinist. I think there is a discord in our society, and
that the unwillingness to respect, encourage and understand the opposite sex is
the ground cause of most of the suffering in our society. We all want to find
true love and balance out the ruffles in the relationship between the masculine
and the feminine (even if it's same sex love – masculine and feminine are not
always distringuished by male/female.) I'll leave my thoughts on the masculine
and feminine for later. That's another blog post altogether.
Back to
women and the stories of our society.
When did I
last see a movie by a female director? Or a story about a female heroine? Or
even a female lead…? period? The first movie that pops into my head is Carrie.
Yeah. Well.
Not exactly Superman material, is she? Even though she's soooort of a heroine.
And a maniac. And a freak. No match for the latest male lead I encountered in
Elysium.
He was a bona fide bad to the bone hero with a heart of gold. Yeah. I
loved it. The movie AND the hero. It reminded me of the female lead role… *thinking*
uhm…
*digging
even deeper*
Lara Croft?
Sort of. Even thought she doesn't really count because that story is not
exactly new, is it? What about Resident Evil? Now THAT'S a bad to the bone
heroine with a heart of gold! Wait a minute… That's ancient too. Xena – warrior
princess? Passé. She-Ra, princess of Power?
Retro, going on vintage. Man,
I'm running out of ideas here.
Let's try a
different approach.
Female
directors.
Ahem.
Sofie
Coppola. And… Well.. Did I mention Sofie Coppola? Yep. Love her. She's one in a
million.
LITERALLY.
Or at least
a thousand. I'm blank. Uhmm… I'm starting to think this whole quota thing might
not be such a bad idea. But wait! What about Norwegian female directors?
There's got to be someone, right?
Margaret
Olin.
Shit. Now
there's the term touchy feely emotionalism all rolled up into one chick flick
creator of epic proportions. I suspect that even female directors make it
because they fit the stagnated stereotypical mold of
touchy-feely-girly-sob-story-directors.
It seems
that female ANYTHINGS in movies has to somehow take care of the mythical
discourse of femininity that broadly fits into the patronizing term "Chick
Flick", "Sob story" or "female superman". Stories about women in our society
today are just as stereotypical as the one-dimensional hero's journey discourse
that we have been served for hundreds of years. The difference is that there
are a multitude of different male characters and roles depicted in popular
culture today. There seems to be just a handful (at best) female roles to fill.
Women are
not just emotional tits on a stick with shiny hair and relationship issues. 
They're not even masculinized iron ladies like Xena, or maniac freaks like
Carrie. And they are not just the prize given to a hero after a long struggling
battle for justice, nor are they the evil wicked witches that do everything in
their power to stop the previously mentioned male lead. They are human beings. And we humans are everything and nothing all rolled into one neat little meat suit.
Even in
Sucker Punch (one of my favorite movies of all time, by the way) the heroine
has to use the stereotypical seductress role to stand her ground.
I'm not
against seductresses. By no means. 
I'd dress up as Baby and seduce the living
sh** out of every male psychiatrist myself, given the chance. I'm not preaching
against maniacs either (I am actually quite fond of maniacs, especially
telekinetic ones). Neither am I speaking up against male lead characters. On
the contrary. I love men. I love male lead characters. I love heroes and I love
villains – I love the multitude of human fates and stories that I get to
encounter in each and every movie. But I love women too.
I love
the quiet grace that comes with women who embody that quiet feminine strength.
And the ceaseless courage that follow in the wake of women defending what they
hold to be true in their hearts. I love the softness and the diamond edged
roughness in women – I love the way a whole story can be grasped in the
utterance of a single syllable and a glance – I love the way the seemingly
fragile feminine spirit can seem to break in a devastating storm, only to show
itself born anew from a branch that didn't break, only bent with the force of
the flood.
And I want
more of them. I want movies like Kill Bill, Tomb Raider, Precious, The Princess
and the Frog, Beauty and the Beast, The blind side, 10th
Kingdom, Lilja 4ever, The color purple, Bandidas, Freeway, Gone with the wind,
The Wizard of Oz, Sucker Punch – I want to be able to CHOOSE which aspect of
our humanness I can watch for however long the movie lasts. I want the real
heroines. I want to be able to gaze upon the screen and marvel at the strengths
that lie dormant in us all – not just in women, but that fierce feminine beauty
that is a part of each and every human being, because we are not just men or
women, male or female, masculine or feminine – we are BOTH.
It's about
time our collective entertainment consciousness came to the same conclusion as
well.
Etiketter:
feminine,
feminism,
masculine,
movies,
pop culture
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Monday, August 19, 2013
Mission Impossible 2
So, I've got a new challenge. A seemingly impossible one.
Let's start at the beginning...
A week ago this guy came to my farm.
His name is Samson. He's a 7 year-old Tinker horse, and he's... Interesting to say the least. I'm not really sure what I'm doing.
This is his home.
He shares it with a beaver and three neighbor horses - a Shetland pony and her baby plus a mean old Iceland horse. See the beaver? I think I'll call him Billy. He's cool.
So what's the impossible challenge?
I have to build a stable.
.......................
I have no idea how to do this.
I don't even know where to begin.
I'm supposed to transform this:
into this:
I know what you're probably thinking: Wouldn't it be smarter to think about that BEFORE getting a horse? Well, truth is, I did. And I thought I had a plan.
It failed.
Sometimes plans fall apart, and you're left with a decision that you can give up and let things go back to how they were, or you can roll up your sleeves and just do it.
Even though you don't know how.
And even if you're a little bit scared and a little bit lonely and a little bit dishearted and disillusioned.
Wish me luck.
Let's start at the beginning...
A week ago this guy came to my farm.
His name is Samson. He's a 7 year-old Tinker horse, and he's... Interesting to say the least. I'm not really sure what I'm doing.
This is his home.
He shares it with a beaver and three neighbor horses - a Shetland pony and her baby plus a mean old Iceland horse. See the beaver? I think I'll call him Billy. He's cool.
So what's the impossible challenge?
I have to build a stable.
.......................
I have no idea how to do this.
I don't even know where to begin.
I'm supposed to transform this:
into this:
I know what you're probably thinking: Wouldn't it be smarter to think about that BEFORE getting a horse? Well, truth is, I did. And I thought I had a plan.
It failed.
Sometimes plans fall apart, and you're left with a decision that you can give up and let things go back to how they were, or you can roll up your sleeves and just do it.
Even though you don't know how.
And even if you're a little bit scared and a little bit lonely and a little bit dishearted and disillusioned.
Wish me luck.
1. From French, from Portuguese barroco a rough or imperfectly shaped pearl.
2. Forceful, restless, unitary in its impact, breaking out beyond its formal limits. It invites emotional response rather than intellectual contemplation.
Its multimedia forms are monumental, exuberant, unstable, theatrical, and metamorphic.
Its psychology is self-aware, mystical, manipulative, melodramatic, and playful.
Its subjects range from the abject to the sublime, from caricatures to idealized portraits, from sexualized ecstasies to bloody dismemberings.
Antonyms: plain, unadorned, undecorated.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













